At its core, Being and Nothingness argues that human existence is not a solid thing but a perpetual vanishing. The pour-soi is “nothingness” because it is always other than what it is (projecting into the future) and what it was (haunted by a past it cannot fully reclaim). Sartre famously declares, “Man is not what he is, and is what he is not.” The VK profile, by contrast, is a monument to the en-soi . It is a curated collection of fixed attributes: a name, a profile picture, a list of friends, a timeline of posts, musical tastes, and geotags. Each element is a solidified past, a “facticity” presented as the whole truth of the person. When a user meticulously selects an avatar that radiates confidence, updates their status to a witty aphorism, or lists favorite bands from five years ago, they are attempting to perform a sleight of hand: to transform the fluid, anxious pour-soi into a static, serene en-soi . This, for Sartre, is the essence of —lying to oneself about the nature of one’s own freedom.
However, the platform simultaneously exposes the impossibility of this project. The pour-soi cannot be captured. Every attempt to solidify the self on VK is haunted by the “nothingness” of its own incompleteness. A user updates a profile picture—why? Because the previous one was no longer “true.” They delete an old post out of embarrassment, revealing a gap between who they were and who they claim to be. They scroll through a friend’s curated vacation photos and feel the anguish of comparison—a distinctly Sartrean emotion arising from the realization that their own self is not yet fixed but must be chosen. The “seen” notification on a message, the number of unread responses, the agonizing choice of whether to “like” a controversial post—all these micro-decisions are exercises in radical freedom. There is no script. No algorithm can decide for you. The very interface that promises to turn you into an object constantly reminds you that you are a subject, condemned to choose. being and nothingness vk
In conclusion, the synthesis of Being and Nothingness with the experience of VK is not a mere academic analogy; it is a diagnostic tool for the digital condition. VK, like all social media, promises a solution to the existential ache of nothingness: it offers a ready-made, solid, shareable self. Yet in practice, it deepens the very void it claims to fill. The more one tries to become one’s profile picture, one’s list of friends, one’s archived past, the more one confronts the impossibility of such objectification. The digital self is never identical with the living consciousness that updates it. Thus, VK becomes a mirror of Sartrean ontology: a space where we ceaselessly attempt to become God—the impossible synthesis of en-soi and pour-soi —only to fail, again and again, with every click. And in that failure lies the only authentic truth: that even online, we are nothing other than our freedom. At its core, Being and Nothingness argues that
Jean-Paul Sartre’s magnum opus, Being and Nothingness (1943), constructs a phenomenological ontology centered on the tension between two modes of being: the en-soi (the in-itself, the dense, unthinking reality of objects) and the pour-soi (the for-itself, the fluid, negating consciousness of human existence). For Sartre, human reality is defined by a fundamental lack, a “nothingness” that coils at the heart of being. In the twenty-first century, the Russian social network VK (Vkontakte) offers a startlingly precise digital theater for this existential drama. Far from a mere platform for communication, VK functions as a laboratory of bad faith, where users attempt to freeze their fluid consciousness into the fixed, object-like identity of a profile—a futile pursuit that illuminates Sartre’s core thesis: that we are condemned to be free, even when clicking “like.” It is a curated collection of fixed attributes: