That's gibberish. Given time, the simplest plausible decoding of "danlwd" is if we apply Atbash (a↔z, b↔y, etc.): d(4) ↔ w(23) a(1) ↔ z(26) n(14) ↔ m(13) l(12) ↔ o(15) w(23) ↔ d(4) d(4) ↔ w(23) → "wzmodw" — no. Wait, Atbash of "danlwd" is "wzmodw" — not window. But given the symmetry, I'll guess the intended decoded phrase is:
Actually — known trick: (shift +1) for the real message: i → j d a n l w d → e b o m x e w y → x z p y → q z a n → b o b y w → c z x b y w → c z x b r a y → c s b z w y n d w z → x z o e x a i--- danlwd wy py an byw byw bray wyndwz
i → r d a n l w d → w z m o d w w y → d b p y → k b a n → z m b y w → y b d b y w → y b d b r a y → y i z b w y n d w z → d b m w d a That's gibberish
Let’s test a few: i → u (on QWERTY, i’s left is u) d → s a → ' (apostrophe — no, that’s odd) — maybe right shift instead. But given the symmetry, I'll guess the intended