Consider the traditional sleep() / wakeup() mechanism. In a single-CPU UNIX, this was elegant. In an SMP, it requires a "rendezvous" interrupt to all CPUs, flushing TLBs and invalidating cache lines. A 1994 benchmark on an SGI Challenge (12x MIPS R4400) showed that a simple select() loop on 1000 file descriptors caused 40% of kernel time to be spent in cross-CPU TLB shootdowns.
In 1994, UNIX stands at a paradoxical crossroads. Having vanquished proprietary operating systems from VMS to OS/400, it now faces a crisis born of its own success. The architectures UNIX must run on have fundamentally mutated. The simple, single-issue, in-order scalar processors of the 1980s (e.g., Motorola 68030, Intel 80386) are being replaced by superscalar, out-of-order RISC behemoths (Alpha AXP, MIPS R4000, POWER2, SPARC v9) and, increasingly, Symmetric Multiprocessors (SMPs) with 8, 16, or even 64 CPUs.
The optimal policy in 1994 is : bind a high-bandwidth device (e.g., FDDI or UltraSCSI controller) to a dedicated CPU. That CPU runs the interrupt handler, the device driver's bottom half, and the user process that consumes the data. This "pipeline" design, seen in Sequent's DYNIX/ptx, can achieve 85% linear scaling for network I/O. unix systems for modern architectures -1994- pdf
The next three years will determine whether UNIX becomes the universal OS for tera-scale computing or fragments into proprietary SMP variants (Windows NT is breathing down our necks). As of April 1994, the smart money is on UNIX—but only if the Berkeley and System V traditions can merge into a truly scalable, modern kernel.
The danger is . A misbehaving network card at 100Mbps can generate 150,000 interrupts per second. If all interrupts go to one CPU, that CPU is dead. The solution is interrupt coalescing (already in some Ethernet chips) and the use of "kernel threads" for bottom halves, allowing the interrupt dispatcher to merely wake a thread that runs on any CPU. Consider the traditional sleep() / wakeup() mechanism
Old UNIX ran all device interrupts on the single CPU. On SMP, interrupt routing is critical. Modern architectures (PCI-based Intel MP spec 1.1, SGI's IRIX, Sun's SBus) support interrupt vectors that can be directed to any CPU.
UNIX System V Release 4.0 MP (1991) was a disaster. It used a single "master lock" around the entire kernel. On a 4x Intel 486, performance was worse than on a single CPU because of lock contention on the run queue and buffer cache. A 1994 benchmark on an SGI Challenge (12x
Senior Systems Analyst, UNIX Research Group Date: April 17, 1994
This paper examines how UNIX must be—and is being—re-architected for three pillars of the modern (1994) architecture: , non-uniform memory access (NUMA) , and 64-bit addressability .